I heard their USA government people say " as a world police its our duty..." related to wars in north Africa. If they claim to be world police or world power and use it related to its recent wars, than what they are doing is dictatorship! there can not be established democracy with wars. These countries that are "threat" are not insane, they just need something normal which can be given in normal talks. Symbiosis is very easy to achieve actually, but none seems to listen what others need. I guess system in the world is the problem, because there are too much people over one problem that it never gets done. example one small country has fuel to sell but no one to buy and its ready to lower the price, and there is a big country that needs fuel. So problem is that there is also endless talks, signings and investing by the smaller nation so the rich can exploit the smaller and get bigger. There is a need for understanding and for mutual help, but i guess we are still in primitive " stronger survives " world.
First of all, so called world police should not be ever one country, but all countries united under a condition; all united must protect the united over others. And membership must be free and available for all. By agreeing to the terms, country is obligated to follow it, but by following it, it agrees that in case of war, union has the power to dismiss all armies from both sides and change the presidents. So in a way, there would be one big union-country and many countries in it with a role that have 50 American states of USA. Where one central unit " CPU " would operate the world, and would not be in any country known today, it would be made new country like World defense union W.D.U. country. Maybe later there would be its institutions in every country. But the point is that there will always be changing of perspective and from former countries we will get smaller entities with smaller responsibility, but same power and less mistakes because every issue would be processed by many people and the ones that receive it would also process it and change stuff together if something is wrong. So something like a big company where every man (country) is dependent of others if he wishes to have a job, and without it he can not.
MONROE - Monroe Doctrine 1823
Moving to protect American hegemony in the Western Hemisphere, President James Monroe declared that henceforth the U.S. would stop any European nation from interfering in the affairs of any country not already colonized.
POLK - Polk Doctrine 1845
A reiteration of the Monroe Doctrine, warning European powers that any encroachment on the North American continent would be met with resistance.
ROOSEVELT (Theodore) - Roosevelt Corollary 1904
The Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine declared that the United States would act as the policeman of the Western hemisphere if a country doing business with Europe was guilty of" chronic wrongdoing or impotence."
TRUMAN - Truman Doctrine 1947
To suppress the possibility of a communist insurgency in Greece and Turkey, President Truman lobbied congress to provide military and economic aid which amounted to $400 million.
EISENHOWER - Eisenhower Doctrine 1957
Expanding on the Truman Doctrine, the Eisenhower Doctrine declares it is the policy of the United States to intervene militarily in the Middle East to protect legitimate governments from communist subversion.
NIXON - Nixon Doctrine 1969
The Nixon Doctrine encouraged Asian allies to slowly wean themselves off U.S. military aid in the war on communism. Over time he used the doctrine to justify the sale of major weapons to the Philippines, Indonesia, South Korea and other countries in Asia and the Middle East.
CARTER - Carter Doctrine 1980
The Carter Doctrine committed the United States to protect the countries of the Persian Gulf from outside interference.
WEINBERGER - Weinberger Doctrine 1984
The Weinberger Doctrine, named in honor of Reagan’s Secretary of Defense, declares it is the policy of the United States to use its military forces only in the defense of American vital interests.
POWELL - Powell Doctrine 1990
The Powell Doctrine states that military force should only be used to win an overwhelming victory in a short period of time. Colin Powell, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the administration of George H.W. Bush, was determined never to commit U.S. troops to another war unless all-out victory was the goal.
CLINTON - Clinton Doctrine 1999
This informal doctrine, never officially articulated by the administration, argued that the best way to ensure stability in regions of interest to the United States was to combat instability wherever it may occur. Reasoning that no matter how seemingly insignificant the areas where instability may arise, violence and disorder can intensify and spread, ultimately threatening United States interests at home and abroad. To stymie potential problems, regional and ethnic conflicts must be addressed as early as possible.
BUSH (GW) - Bush Doctrine 2001
The Bush Doctrine declares it is the policy of the United States government to go after all terrorists with a global reach and the states which harbor them. A key element is the right of the United States to preempt an attack on the United States in order to" confront the worst threats before they emerge."
OBAMA - Obama Doctrine 2011
It depends on who you ask
HOME
First of all, so called world police should not be ever one country, but all countries united under a condition; all united must protect the united over others. And membership must be free and available for all. By agreeing to the terms, country is obligated to follow it, but by following it, it agrees that in case of war, union has the power to dismiss all armies from both sides and change the presidents. So in a way, there would be one big union-country and many countries in it with a role that have 50 American states of USA. Where one central unit " CPU " would operate the world, and would not be in any country known today, it would be made new country like World defense union W.D.U. country. Maybe later there would be its institutions in every country. But the point is that there will always be changing of perspective and from former countries we will get smaller entities with smaller responsibility, but same power and less mistakes because every issue would be processed by many people and the ones that receive it would also process it and change stuff together if something is wrong. So something like a big company where every man (country) is dependent of others if he wishes to have a job, and without it he can not.
MONROE - Monroe Doctrine 1823
Moving to protect American hegemony in the Western Hemisphere, President James Monroe declared that henceforth the U.S. would stop any European nation from interfering in the affairs of any country not already colonized.
POLK - Polk Doctrine 1845
A reiteration of the Monroe Doctrine, warning European powers that any encroachment on the North American continent would be met with resistance.
ROOSEVELT (Theodore) - Roosevelt Corollary 1904
The Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine declared that the United States would act as the policeman of the Western hemisphere if a country doing business with Europe was guilty of" chronic wrongdoing or impotence."
TRUMAN - Truman Doctrine 1947
To suppress the possibility of a communist insurgency in Greece and Turkey, President Truman lobbied congress to provide military and economic aid which amounted to $400 million.
EISENHOWER - Eisenhower Doctrine 1957
Expanding on the Truman Doctrine, the Eisenhower Doctrine declares it is the policy of the United States to intervene militarily in the Middle East to protect legitimate governments from communist subversion.
NIXON - Nixon Doctrine 1969
The Nixon Doctrine encouraged Asian allies to slowly wean themselves off U.S. military aid in the war on communism. Over time he used the doctrine to justify the sale of major weapons to the Philippines, Indonesia, South Korea and other countries in Asia and the Middle East.
CARTER - Carter Doctrine 1980
The Carter Doctrine committed the United States to protect the countries of the Persian Gulf from outside interference.
WEINBERGER - Weinberger Doctrine 1984
The Weinberger Doctrine, named in honor of Reagan’s Secretary of Defense, declares it is the policy of the United States to use its military forces only in the defense of American vital interests.
POWELL - Powell Doctrine 1990
The Powell Doctrine states that military force should only be used to win an overwhelming victory in a short period of time. Colin Powell, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the administration of George H.W. Bush, was determined never to commit U.S. troops to another war unless all-out victory was the goal.
CLINTON - Clinton Doctrine 1999
This informal doctrine, never officially articulated by the administration, argued that the best way to ensure stability in regions of interest to the United States was to combat instability wherever it may occur. Reasoning that no matter how seemingly insignificant the areas where instability may arise, violence and disorder can intensify and spread, ultimately threatening United States interests at home and abroad. To stymie potential problems, regional and ethnic conflicts must be addressed as early as possible.
BUSH (GW) - Bush Doctrine 2001
The Bush Doctrine declares it is the policy of the United States government to go after all terrorists with a global reach and the states which harbor them. A key element is the right of the United States to preempt an attack on the United States in order to" confront the worst threats before they emerge."
OBAMA - Obama Doctrine 2011
It depends on who you ask
HOME
No comments:
Post a Comment